← Retour aux guides

Prompt Caching vs Re-Sending Context: Cut LLM Costs

Prompt caching: the simplest way to stop paying twice

If your app sends the same long instructions, policies, tool schemas, or reference docs on every request, you are paying for the same context over and over. Prompt caching solves that by letting you reuse stable prompt content instead of re-billing it each time. The result is fewer input tokens, lower latency, and a smaller bill.

The key idea is simple: separate what rarely changes from what changes every turn. The stable part becomes the cacheable prefix; the dynamic part stays in the live request. This is especially useful for chat assistants, agent workflows, code review tools, and support bots that repeat large system prompts.

What prompt caching saves compared with the default approach

Without caching, every request sends the entire prompt: system message, examples, instructions, tool definitions, and the latest user message. If that prompt is 8,000 tokens and only 200 tokens change, you are still paying to process almost all 8,000 tokens every time.

With caching, the provider can reuse the repeated prefix. In practice, that means you may only pay full price for the first request that seeds the cache, then pay much less for later requests that hit the cached segment. You also reduce latency because the model does not need to reprocess the same giant context from scratch every time.

When prompt caching is worth it

• Long system prompts: agent instructions, safety rules, and brand voice guidelines.
• Tool-heavy apps: function schemas and JSON definitions that rarely change.
• Document-based workflows: product manuals, contracts, or knowledge bases reused across many conversations.
• Developer tools: codebase summaries, repo conventions, and review rubrics.
• Support assistants: FAQ packs and escalation policies that stay constant for hours or days.

Pros and cons of prompt caching

Pros

• Lower token spend on repeated prompts.
• Faster responses on cache hits.
• Better scalability for high-volume apps.
• Cleaner prompt architecture because you are forced to isolate static context.

Cons

• Only helps when the same prefix repeats often.
• Cache hit behavior depends on the provider and model support.
• Very small prompts may not save enough to matter.
• You still need good prompt design; caching does not fix bad prompts.

How to set it up in a practical way

Start by auditing your requests. Log token counts and identify anything that appears in nearly every call. Then split your prompt into two parts: a stable prefix and a variable suffix. Keep the prefix identical whenever possible, because even small changes can reduce cache effectiveness.

Next, test your implementation with a real workload. Compare three numbers: input tokens, latency, and cost per successful task. Run one week with full prompts and one week with caching enabled, then measure the difference. If you are using a model or SDK that supports prompt caching, follow its exact cache markers or cache-control rules so the provider can detect the reusable section.

For best results, keep the cached block in a consistent order, avoid unnecessary whitespace changes, and do not insert volatile values such as timestamps, request IDs, or user-specific metadata into the cached prefix.

Prompt caching vs using a cheaper API relay

Prompt caching reduces how many tokens you send. A low-cost relay reduces what you pay per token. The smartest setup uses both.

59API is a strong fit here because it gives developers cheap, pay-as-you-go access to Claude models, GPT models, and more through a single relay endpoint at https://api.59api.com. It is fully compatible with Claude Code, Codex, and any OpenAI SDK, so you can keep your existing integration while cutting overhead. Since 59API uses native official-quality models with no downgrade, you are optimizing cost without giving up model quality.

That matters when you are running long-lived assistants or coding agents. If your app sends large repeated prompts, prompt caching reduces repetition; if you also route through 59API, your baseline pricing is already among the cheapest available. Add the referral rebate, and the savings compound further.

Best practice: use caching for repetition, not everything

Do not try to cache every request blindly. Cache the parts that are genuinely stable and high-value: policy text, tool schemas, and shared reference material. Keep the variable user input outside the cache so the model still sees the current task clearly.

If you are building on Claude or GPT models and want a simple way to keep costs down, this is the combination to try first: cache the repeated prefix, measure token usage, and run it through a low-cost relay like 59API. If you are ready to test a cheaper setup, sign up and run a real workload with your longest prompt today.

Tarifs · Docs