← Retour aux guides

Production LLM Best Practices: A Troubleshooting FAQ

Moving an LLM feature from prototype to production changes the engineering problem. Real users send unexpected inputs, traffic spikes, providers return errors, and token costs accumulate. This troubleshooting FAQ covers practical steps for making an application more reliable, secure, and affordable.

Why does the model behave differently on real user input?

Prototype prompts usually meet clean, short examples. Production inputs may be ambiguous, adversarial, multilingual, or much longer than expected. Start by recording representative requests and reviewing failures by category, not just by reading a few transcripts. Track prompt version, model, latency, token usage, and outcome. Avoid logging sensitive content unless you have a clear retention and access policy.

Set explicit input limits and validate structured fields before calling the model. For long documents, retrieve only relevant passages rather than placing an entire corpus in the prompt. Add instructions for uncertainty and missing information, and test edge cases such as empty input, conflicting facts, and prompt injection.

How do I reduce hallucinations?

First, decide which answers must be grounded in approved data. For those workflows, retrieve relevant sources, include them in the request, and require the response to cite or identify its supporting material. Validate citations against the retrieved passages; a citation-shaped string is not proof that a claim is supported.

Use deterministic checks for facts that can be checked in code, such as totals, permissions, dates, and required fields. Ask the model for structured output when your application expects a schema, then parse and validate that output before using it. If validation fails, retry selectively or return a clear fallback instead of silently accepting malformed content.

What should I do about timeouts and rate limits?

Set a request timeout that matches the user-facing workflow, and handle provider errors explicitly. Retry transient network failures, rate limits, and selected server errors with exponential backoff and jitter. Respect any retry guidance returned by the API. Do not retry every failure: invalid requests and authentication errors need a fix, not another attempt.

Set a maximum retry count and an overall deadline so retries cannot keep a user waiting indefinitely. For long-running tasks, use a background job and report progress separately. Add concurrency limits, queueing, and graceful fallbacks for traffic spikes. Monitor error rate and latency by model and endpoint so a slow dependency does not look like a general application outage.

How can I control LLM spending?

Measure input and output tokens per feature, then set budgets for both. Trim redundant context, cap output length, and cache results when identical requests can safely share an answer. Route routine tasks to a lower-cost model that passes your quality checks, reserving more capable options for tasks that need them. Evaluate quality on a fixed set of representative cases before changing a model or prompt.

For example, compare DeepSeek V4 Flash for a high-volume classification workflow with Claude Sonnet 5.5 for a task requiring more complex reasoning. The right choice depends on measured quality, latency, and price for your workload, not a benchmark headline.

How should I secure an LLM integration?

Keep API keys on the server, store them in a secrets manager, and rotate them. Never put a shared production key in browser code or a public repository. Apply authentication, per-user quotas, input size limits, and abuse monitoring. Treat model output as untrusted: escape it before rendering, avoid executing generated code without isolation and review, and enforce authorization in application logic rather than relying on prompt instructions.

Is an API relay suitable for production?

A relay can simplify access to multiple models, but check its compatibility, pricing, available models, and operational fit. 59API offers pay-as-you-go access to current models, including GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.1 Pro, through an API compatible with OpenAI SDKs and tools such as Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI. Its API base URL is https://api.59api.com. The service describes its models as native official-quality versions without downgrade, and offers a referral rebate. Verify current rates and terms before deployment, and test your own workload for quality and latency.

If you want to compare models without committing to a fixed subscription, you can sign up for 59API and run a small, representative evaluation before routing production traffic.

What should I monitor after launch?

Track request volume, success and timeout rates, latency percentiles, token usage, cost, and application-level quality signals. Alert on meaningful changes, not just individual failures. Keep a regression set for prompt and model changes, deploy updates gradually, and preserve a rollback path. Production readiness is an ongoing cycle: measure real failures, fix the highest-impact cause, and verify the change against the same tests.

Tarifs · Docs