← Retour aux guides

max_tokens and Temperature: A Coding Quick-Start Guide

For coding tasks, start with a modest output budget and low temperature, then adjust based on test results. The goal is not the longest answer or the most deterministic-looking code: it is a complete, correct change at a predictable cost. Here is a practical setup you can apply in minutes.

1. Understand what each setting controls

max_tokens usually sets an upper bound on generated tokens, not words or lines of code. It does not control the size of your input. Code tokenization varies with language, identifiers, and formatting, so estimate from actual usage rather than a fixed tokens-per-line formula.

Parameter names vary by API and endpoint. You may need max_completion_tokens or max_output_tokens instead. Some models count internal reasoning against the generation budget, leaving fewer tokens for visible code. Check the selected model’s request schema rather than blindly renaming fields.

temperature controls sampling variability. Lower values generally make responses more focused; higher values allow more variation. Zero does not guarantee identical output or correct code. Some models restrict temperature or do not support changing it; omit it when unsupported.

2. Pick a budget for the deliverable

Use these as initial output budgets, not universal limits. Each assumes you request only the necessary code and a short explanation:

• 512–1,024 tokens: a small helper, targeted SQL fix, or explanation of one compiler error.
• 2,048–4,096 tokens: a function rewrite, focused patch, or unit tests for one component.
• 4,096–8,192 tokens: several related changes with tests, provided the model supports that output limit.

For a larger refactor, split work by module or dependency boundary. Asking for an entire application in one response makes truncation, review, and debugging harder. Request a unified diff when appropriate; it often avoids paying to regenerate unchanged files.

A higher cap does not force the model to use every token. Usage-based billing generally follows actual consumption, subject to the service’s pricing rules. Nevertheless, an unnecessarily large cap permits longer, more expensive responses.

3. Set temperature for the task

• Bug fixes, migrations, and structured output: start at 0–0.2 if supported.
• Routine implementation and test generation: start at 0.2; evaluate the result before increasing it.
• Exploring alternative designs: try 0.4–0.7, then use a lower setting when implementing the selected approach.

Leave top_p at its default initially. Changing multiple sampling controls together makes failures harder to diagnose. For creative exploration, explicitly ask for three alternatives; temperature alone does not ensure useful diversity.

4. Make the first request specific

A practical starting request is: “Fix this function without changing its public signature. Return a unified diff and two regression tests. Do not rewrite unrelated code.” Supply the relevant source, failing test, and exact error message. Begin with a 2,048-token output budget and temperature 0.2 where supported.

On 59API, configure your client with the API base URL https://api.59api.com, your API key, and the model identifier supplied by the service. Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol are concrete options to evaluate. Confirm each model’s accepted parameters before reusing the same request settings.

5. Detect truncation before tuning creativity

Inspect the completion’s stop metadata. Depending on the API, finish_reason may be “length,” or stop_reason may be “max_tokens.” These indicate a budget-related stop, not a finished implementation. An unfinished code block is another warning sign, but metadata is more reliable.

If output is truncated, increase the budget or narrow the task. Do not raise temperature to fix missing code. Also verify that input plus the requested generation budget fits the model’s context window.

6. Optimize cost per working patch

Run the generated tests and your existing checks. Track actual token usage, latency, retries, and whether the patch passes. Change one setting at a time across representative tasks. A cheaper request that needs repeated repairs can cost more overall.

59API’s low-cost, pay-as-you-go relay makes these comparisons accessible, with native official-quality models rather than downgraded substitutes. Compatibility with OpenAI SDKs, Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI helps it fit existing workflows. If you want to benchmark a small coding workload, consider signing up and comparing settings before scaling usage.

Tarifs · Docs