← Retour aux guides

Compare AI Context Windows: A Developer Quick Start

Start with usable context, not the biggest number

A context window is the token capacity available to a model for a request, subject to that model’s accounting rules. It typically covers input plus generated output. Your input includes system instructions, conversation history, tool definitions, tool results, and attached content—not just the latest user message.

When comparing context windows across Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, Qwen, and Grok, avoid ranking whole families by one advertised maximum. Limits vary by exact model, endpoint, and sometimes account configuration. A larger window also does not guarantee better retrieval, reasoning, or instruction following.

1. Build a five-field comparison sheet

For each candidate, record the following from current model documentation and your API provider’s supported configuration:

• Exact model identifier: Use the identifier accepted by the API, not a family nickname.
• Context limit: Note whether the documented limit is shared input/output capacity or a separate input allowance.
• Maximum output: A large context window can still have a much smaller generation limit.
• Token accounting: Check how images, audio, tool messages, cached input, and reasoning tokens are counted or billed.
• Price and latency: Record input, output, and any applicable long-context or caching rates.

For example, compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro as specific deployments, rather than assuming all Claude or Gemini models share their limits. Model-list endpoints may expose identifiers without context metadata, so do not treat a successful listing as proof of capacity.

2. Normalize differences across families

Use the same questions for every family, but pay attention to request-format differences:

• Claude and GPT: Include system instructions, tool schemas, conversation turns, and tool outputs when estimating the request footprint.
• Gemini: For multimodal workloads, compare the documented token treatment of your actual images, audio, or video—not just text capacity.
• DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, Qwen, and Grok: Check the exact model’s reasoning behavior, output cap, and supported API parameters. Never inherit limits from another model in the family.

For all families, verify the configuration exposed through your chosen endpoint. SDK compatibility standardizes integration, not context limits or model behavior.

3. Calculate a safe input budget

For a model with a shared context limit, use: usable input = context limit − reserved output − safety margin. Then subtract instructions, history, and tools to find the space left for documents.

Illustrative example—not a specification for any named model: a 128,000-token window, a 16,000-token output reservation, and an 8,000-token safety margin leave 104,000 tokens for input. If instructions, history, and tools consume 14,000 tokens, your document budget is 90,000 tokens.

Use provider token-counting tools where available. Character-based estimates are only rough approximations, especially for code, non-English text, and multimodal content. Check response usage fields against your estimates.

4. Run a small, realistic context test

Prepare representative requests at roughly 25%, 50%, and 80% of each candidate’s verified usable input budget. Keep the task and output requirements consistent.

• Place required facts near the beginning, middle, and end of the input.
• Add plausible distractors and require citations to document sections or filenames.
• Score factual accuracy, missed requirements, latency, and total request cost.
• Test overflow behavior: does the API reject excess input, or does a client or application layer truncate it?

For repository work, ask for a change spanning several files and check the resulting patch. Finding a planted sentence is useful, but it does not prove the model can reason across a codebase.

5. Choose the cheapest configuration that passes

Use retrieval, selective file loading, or conversation summaries when the task does not require the entire source. Sending fewer tokens often improves both cost and response time. Keep original sources accessible because summaries can omit critical details.

59API offers low-cost, pay-as-you-go access across these model families using native official-quality models without downgrading. Its API base URL is https://api.59api.com, with compatibility for OpenAI SDKs, Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI. Follow its integration instructions for the required endpoint path and authentication.

If you want to compare candidates without separate provider integrations, consider signing up for 59API and running the same small benchmark across your shortlist. Pick the model that meets your accuracy, capacity, latency, and cost targets—not simply the one advertising the largest window.

Tarifs · Docs