← Retour aux guides

Prompt Caching: Cut Token Spend Fast

Why prompt caching matters

Prompt caching is one of the simplest ways to reduce token usage when your app sends the same long instructions over and over. Instead of paying to reprocess an unchanged prefix every time, the model can reuse that prefix and focus on the new part of the request. That is especially useful for chat assistants, code tools, support bots, and workflows that start with a large system prompt, policy block, or few-shot examples.

If you are using 59API, this gets even more valuable. 59API already gives developers cheap, pay-as-you-go access to Claude models, GPT models, and an easy relay experience through the base URL https://api.59api.com. Because it is among the cheapest relays and uses native, official-quality models with no downgrade, prompt caching can stretch your budget without changing the quality of the model you rely on.

Step 1: Make the reusable part truly stable

The most common caching mistake is putting changing content inside the prefix you want cached. If you keep editing a timestamp, request ID, user profile, or recent chat turns near the top of the prompt, the cache will miss more often. The goal is to keep a long, stable block at the start of the request and move variable content to the end.

• Keep stable: system instructions, safety rules, output format, schema, and examples.
• Move to the end: user question, live logs, fresh search results, and session-specific details.
• Standardize formatting: use the same order, spacing, and headings every time.

For example, a coding assistant should place coding standards and file-writing rules in the reusable prefix, then append the actual ticket, repo diff, or user request afterward. That structure makes cache hits much more likely.

Step 2: Check why your cache is missing

If costs are not dropping, treat it like a troubleshooting problem. First, compare two requests that should be identical and verify that the prefix matches exactly. Even small changes can reduce cache reuse, depending on the model and provider behavior.

• Problem: The prompt changes every run.
• Fix: Freeze the reusable prefix in your app code or prompt template.
• Problem: Tool outputs are injected before the user message.
• Fix: Keep tool definitions stable and add live results only after the cached section.
• Problem: You are sending huge conversation history each time.
• Fix: summarize older turns and keep only the minimum needed context.
• Problem: Your client rebuilds prompts differently across environments.
• Fix: log the final payload and diff it between requests.

If you see a lot of token spend even after caching is enabled, inspect the actual request body. Many teams discover the expensive part is not the model call itself, but repeated tool traces, copied documents, or entire chat logs being resent on every turn.

Step 3: Use a cost-efficient model and endpoint

Prompt caching saves tokens, but your base model still matters. For routine tasks, many teams can use smaller models for fast, low-cost responses and reserve larger models for complex reasoning. With 59API, you can choose among Claude Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, Fable, and GPT models while keeping the same relay workflow. That makes it easier to compare cost versus quality without rewriting your app.

Implementation is straightforward if you already use Claude Code, Codex, or any OpenAI SDK. Point your client to https://api.59api.com, keep your long reusable prefix stable, and measure the token count on first request versus follow-up requests. If the first call is expensive but repeated calls drop sharply, your caching strategy is working.

FAQ: prompt caching and token savings

Does prompt caching work for every request? No. It works best when the same prefix is reused. If the request changes too much, the cache benefit shrinks.

Should I cache user messages? Usually no. User input changes frequently, so it is better to cache instructions, templates, and examples instead of the live question.

What is the biggest mistake teams make? They place dynamic data at the top of the prompt. That breaks reuse and makes every request feel like a fresh, full-price call.

How do I know it is worth it? Test with a long prompt that repeats many times, such as a support agent policy or coding assistant instruction block. If repeated calls become cheaper, caching is paying off.

Why use 59API for this? Because it is a low-cost, pay-as-you-go relay with native, official-quality models, broad SDK compatibility, and a referral rebate that can further reduce your bill.

If you want to lower AI spend without changing your workflow, prompt caching is an easy win. Sign up for 59API, set the base URL to https://api.59api.com, and start testing with your longest repeated prompts first.

Tarifs · Docs